SERVICES

The cost of architectural services varies according to the scope and complexity of the project. Small additions can range from a few thousand dollars to tens of thousands of dollars. Many of our projects include ranches and colonials in the $2,500 - $60,000 range.

THE WORKING RELATIONSHIP

Gienapp Design is committed to establishing a positive working relationship with our clients. Etc. Etc. Etc.

THE CLIENT*

A central ingredient in the most successful design projects is a good client. Some clients have clear idea of program, budget, and other project objectives, including the final appearance of the building. Others look to their architect to help them define the project objectives, as well as to design a building that meets these goals. In both cases, the effectiveness of the marriage between clients and architecture is a major factor in making design decisions throughout the project.

COST*

It is important to analyze the project budget to understand its implication for the building design. Virtually all project budgets are limited. The architect must make careful use of funds, directing them to those decisions that appear to be most important to the success of the design solution. An experienced analysis of the budget can usually identify the size of the discretionary portion as well as establish clear guidelines for the basic system selections to take place during the design.

ESTABLISHING DESIGN GOALS*

The client and design team have goals, expressed formally or informally, for the project. These goals create functional and aesthetic guidelines for judging design decisions, and the project objectives help establish priorities when trade-offs must be accommodated in the design solution. Compromises between budget and quality, appearance and energy efficiency, and hundreds of other decisions have to be made within the context of an understanding of project goals and priorities.

EVOLVING A DESIGN CONCEPT*

With the design goals in hand, the architect develops a design concept - or perhaps several. This may be a plan concept, the section of a geometric form, a decision to mass the building vertically or horizontally, or the use of an organizing element (such as a central mall for the interior spaces). The concept might be based on a particular image or a historic precedent. It may employ a "design vocabulary" of formal and aesthetic ideas that will govern the development of the design. Whatever the underlying principles, it is common for architects to develop several representations and variations to help them understand and articulate the evolving design concepts.

EVALUATING CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES*

Working with these possibilities and variations, most architects have developed a process for narrowing them down to a set of workable concepts. In some cases, the selection of alternatives is based on a point-by-point evaluation of the concept against the original project objectives. In other cases, it is an intuitive judgment based on experience. In most cases, it is a combination of both.

CONTRACTUAL FRAMEWORK*

Design is undertaken within a contractual framework that

  • Outlines design tasks and requirements

  • Identifies specific responsiblities for design, uncliding those of the architects, of the owner, and possibly of third parties
  • Establishes a schedule, unclidng starting and completion dates
  • Often defines design phases with interim milestone dates and owner approvals to proceed.

This contractual framework is established in the agreement between owner and architect. Design activities may be described in detail or, in the case of small or mimited scope projects, in a few sentences. AIA Document B141, the most commonly used form of owner-architect agreement, establishes five project phases:

* - Content courtesy of The Architect's
Handbook of Professional Practice,
12th edition
published by the American Institute of Architects